• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s not what I’m saying at all. I think you’ve lost the context here. Let me summarize the exchange:

    “Who is going to hold him accountable when Congress and the courts won’t?”

    “The people should rise up”

    “How?”

    “By using the courts and Congress”

    This is where I’m confused. I’m not saying those aren’t things we should do, but this was explicitly a question about what to do when those methods are failing.

        • grindemup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          No, I don’t think enough people are doing that, and I think that organization and advocation is needed rather than going on social media to spread defeatism.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            No one is promoting defeatism, I think you might have a habit of assuming questions are rhetorical when they aren’t.

            The question is that of organization. Just saying to organize isn’t an answer. How do you organize millions of people?

            • grindemup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree. Like it or not, saying “Who is going to stop him?” is promoting a defeatist attitude amongst anyone who reads it. Why not say, “Fuck this, I’m writing to my congress person and taking to the streets again with everyone who I can possibly convince.” No one person is going to solve this alone, but a whole lot of people saying “Well what now 🤷” isn’t actually helpful.