cm0002@no.lastname.nz to Privacy@programming.dev · 2 days agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up178arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up177arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comcm0002@no.lastname.nz to Privacy@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square6linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
minus-squareMugita Sokio@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 days agoHere’s how it’s supposed to be said, and I just did this earlier on Mastodon: “I have nothing to hide, so you shouldn’t surveil me. You have something to hide, so I should surveil you.”
Here’s how it’s supposed to be said, and I just did this earlier on Mastodon:
“I have nothing to hide, so you shouldn’t surveil me. You have something to hide, so I should surveil you.”