• novibe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    No AI is the product of any theft. If we’re talking about piracy, piracy is NOT theft. I thought we all agreed on this already.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Piracy only affects existing work, genAI affects all the future artwork they would try to make a living from.

        This is certifiable baloney.

        • kazerniel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That was the point I was trying to make too. The question of “is it theft” is moot, it still causes harm.

          • novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            But piracy is a MUCH smaller issue than theft. Piracy doesn’t deprive the original owner of any material thing. Piracy might decrease sales and profits (research actually says the opposite 🤷‍♂️).

            And we have no idea the actual material impact AI will have on the arts. From the reaction we’re seeing it might even make people turn more and more to physical hand crafted art.

            We’re already seeing that social media is favoring videos of artists’ processes much more than the final results.

            So yeah, no, I don’t see this situation as so much more terrible than theft. I really don’t understand how it could be.

            To me it seems the main issue is not even AI, it’s capitalism. If artists didn’t need to sell their art to survive, we wouldn’t even have this discussion.