No, objectively right. You can quantify the overall appeal very easily. It was the top user-rated game on MetaCritic EVER, had critical acclaim, obviously won many awards despite this AI debacle in the IGAs, sold over 5 million copies already even though it was on GamePass, and has maintained a fan gathering all these many months later even before they won at the TGAs.
And since you edited yours, I’ll just edit this: that’s not true. It’s primarily a subjective word, but only when you cannot quantify the statement. Look at sports statistics as a prime example of this. You can get a “best” players, teams, etc of a sport based on their actual performance, especially if you are looking at specific stats and use that stat as part of the statement you’re making.
No, objectively right. You can quantify the overall appeal very easily. It was the top user-rated game on MetaCritic EVER, had critical acclaim, obviously won many awards despite this AI debacle in the IGAs, sold over 5 million copies already even though it was on GamePass, and has maintained a fan gathering all these many months later even before they won at the TGAs.
No, the word “best” is objectively subjective. You’re wrong.
K.
And since you edited yours, I’ll just edit this: that’s not true. It’s primarily a subjective word, but only when you cannot quantify the statement. Look at sports statistics as a prime example of this. You can get a “best” players, teams, etc of a sport based on their actual performance, especially if you are looking at specific stats and use that stat as part of the statement you’re making.
Thanks for the incorrection.