• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    Where did I say anything about reproduction? Are you so pathetic you cannot even work past baby’s first talking points?

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      You’re shrieking with baby’s first rage at the thought of people avoiding dates with white people because of the exactly correct definition of whiteness that you already baby’s first conceded.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        I don’t care who others date. I do care about people spreading racist hate. Your bigotry is not appreciated and it’s hilarious that you claim to be against racism while espousing such bigotry. Genuinely, you are pathetically not self-aware.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          You already conceded that white is not a race; it’s the social designation of who deserves privilege in society. So I don’t understand why you’re talking out of both sides of baby’s first mouth.

          • Carrot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Mate, using your logic “black” isn’t a race. This is also technically true, but not really how the term “race” is used. Taking your logic and applying it to this term that is widely accepted caloquially as a race, you end up being able to say that it’s “impossible to be racist against black people” which would be seen as a racist remark.

              • Carrot@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                Explain how it isn’t? Typically once someone resorts to name calling in a discussion it’s a good sign they know they’re in the wrong.

                • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 days ago

                  fuck you

                  you explain how the shit you decided to write is my logic

                  fucking asshole pompous piece of shit hypocrite

                  self oblivious dumb motherfucker

                  • Carrot@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 days ago

                    Fine, I’ll indulge you.

                    white isn’t a race it’s the social construct

                    This is both true and false. By all accepted definitions of race that I could find, white counts as a race. However, race as a concept is a social construct. Some folks back in the day decided to categorize people by things they have in common. (e.g. physical attributes, geographic location, genetics) However, this doesn’t have any basis in science due to there being more genetic variation within the defined races than between them. Most biologists and anthropologists don’t accept race as a scientifically valid biological classification.

                    that means the absence of race

                    This is false by all definitions of race. Race is just a collection of people sharing similar attributes, so the “white” race absolutely counts, considering all “white” people share a similar characteristic: skin color.

                    Irish stopped being a race when they were accepted into whiteness by becoming police in large number

                    This one threw me for a loop, as I’m not really sure what you mean by this. Irish is 100% still a race, as they are a group of people that can be defined by geographic location. There are groups that don’t think they belong in the greater “white” race due to some historical beefs, but at the end of the day, most definitions of the “white” race include Irish folks, as they have white skin.

                    That’s why it’s literally impossible to be racist against white people

                    This part doesn’t make sense. By the most common definitions of racist, it’s possible to be racist against any given race. Some definitions of racist that I read in school did change that by adding a clause for racism being prejudice towards a marginalized group. In that case, it wouldn’t be possible to be racist towards the greater “white” race, as they have never historically been marginalised. However, this definition of racist hasn’t been widely accepted, as it almost exists to prevent being able to say racism towards the “white” race exists.

                    If you think that it’s impossible to be racist towards a race that is all-encompassing like the “white” race, then, unless you’re using a different definition of racist, then if would be equally impossible to be racist towards the all-encompassing “black” race.

                    No need to lash out just because people are calling you out for your misunderstanding of your own words. Given how your sentences are written, English might not be your first language, so there’s a good chance that this misunderstanding comes from a translation or language barrier. Hopefully I have cleared things up!