• Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fake: Anon claims to bang a dude who looks like an older version of him

    Gay: Anon is fantasizing about banging an older man

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        When you’re in balls-deep and give one final buck, spraying your thick batter deep into him, and you feel his legs tighten around your waist and his fingers dog into your back as he erupts into the paper-thin gap between your stomachs as as your tongue fights his and his fights yours, and you pull away with your lips still bridged by saliva and sweat and you stare at his face framed by your hands and you caress his chin with your thumb and realise he’s the most beautiful thing you’ve ever seen and you stare into his big, deep eyes and he stares back into yours he whispers “I love you” and you whisper back “I love you too” I cannot even begin to stress how important it is to say “no homo” otherwise you might give off the wrong signals.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    What’s with the absolute horrible crop? It’s not like 4chan puts a watermark on the left side or anything…

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Looking past the obvious WTF, dude ain’t curious about his deceased brother(s)? 🤔

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve reread it and don’t see where it says anything about siblings, alive or dead?

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        “Written will says most of it is to go to his living son”

        Try to read first, it’s right there in the post.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes, but there wouldn’t be a reason to say living son unless there was a deceased sibling. The wording implies one or more deaths.

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Legal documents tend to just specify things like that as a matter of course. Boilerplate is easier to adapt than starting from scratch every time.

            • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The trouble is that legal documents are often very specifically worded to avoid implications. Legal writing is almost like a different dialect to usual colloquial English.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              Suppose he willed his car to his living son, his house to his son, and the remainder of his estate to Bob.

              He dies. Son is alive. In this case, son gets house and car. Bob gets everything else.

              Suppose son dies first. In this case, the house transfers to the son’s estate, where it is then transferred to son’s heirs. The house was bequeathed to the “son”.

              But the car does not transfer to the son’s estate. The car was bequeathed to the “living son”. The car transfers to Bob with the rest of Dad’s estate, not to the son’s heirs.

            • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Dude, its made up by some 4chan’er trolling for lol’s, it’s not a legeal document :)

  • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    We need a rule against shit that’s just straight-up sad, even if it is “fake & gay”. I guess I would settle for an incest flag, because I’m also not reading any of that by choice.