• HailSeitan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Revisionist bullshit. Despite what came later, Facebook was the privacy-respecting alternative to MySpace at the time.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      How was the “dumb fucks” platform ever privacy-respecting? The shit came out later, but it was always a privacy nightmare since the farmville days and even as “The Facebook”

      edit: I just read another comment about the Google adserve partnership, didn’t know that, guess I see your angle now. But still, it was only surface appearance of privacy, behind the scenes the Zucc has always been the same and doing their own tracking instead of partnering with someone else

      • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t know why are you so angry with poor Zucc. He just wanted to oogle his classmate’s bathsuit pics, isn’t that relatable?

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      My memory of MySpace was creating over 2 dozen accounts and maxing out the Playlists.just a bunch of my favorite albums uploaded, as my friends ‘private’ music server.

    • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t know that Facebook ever sold itself that way. It was privacy respecting perhaps only because it only allowed college students to sign up for it, so only your classmates could see what you were doing. However, shortly after launching Zuck came out with the news feed, which told everyone whenever you looked at their profile. People hated this! The news feed in general felt like a huge privacy violation and Zuck issued his first apology. Still, they kept the news feed.

      Soon they also allowed photo sharing and this is how everyone got into trouble though, as people posted photos of themselves partying and then their friends tagged them in those photos and then a couple years later, Facebook let everyone’s parents in and by that point people were trying to get jobs. It quickly became clear that maybe sharing everything on Facebook wasn’t a good idea.

      • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Zuck promised flat out that there wouldn’t be any spying or surveillance, ever. That turned out to be a massive lie, of course (just as when Page & Brin told us in 1998 that they believed advertising was incompatible with search), but it was a big part of the draw of the early Facebook that you (seemingly) didn’t have to choose between your friends and getting spied on by Rupert Murdoch & Co over at Myspace.