• Insekticus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Also, from a scientific point of view, Chinese research has a strong history of just making shit up. They’re one of the biggest polluters in journal articles with irreproducible research, illogical conclusions, and major conflicts of interest.

    When their autocratic government has its hands in everything, you can’t trust anything.

    Edit: just a little source before anyone asks https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2891906/

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        I mean, they were shit for a very long period of time. But at least in my domain they’ve (I think?) gotten much better. I wouldn’t cite any Chinese research in my work from 10-20 years go. These days, I really need to scrutinize something. There is still definitely a paper mill aspect to what I read (I was reviewing a paper as a referee the other day and I swore I was missing it, until like, the 5th re-read, and yes. They had no N for their sample size), but like, there definitely has been a shift.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Well, since you’re source isn’t from the Chinese government, it will be taken by some as western propaganda