• Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    To everybody acting like the desire path is the problem:

    1. If the problem for you is that it’s ‘bad’ or ‘illegal’, grow a spine so that when you need to break the law, for something that matters, you can do it with dry pants.
    2. If the design doesn’t take into account how people will interact with it, it’s bad and lazy. Only time it would be acceptable to ‘force’ a way to interact with something is when there are safety concerns, and there are none here.
    3. You are traped in a cage of your own making, break free or perish like the dog you are.
    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wanted to say that surely nobody is complaining about desire paths and then I scrolled just a little bit… yikes!

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    But why is it human nature to put a bench right where people are walking. It’s like people in charge get off on creating obstacles for the common man just to feel powerful.

      • nesc@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, don’t design park the brain-dead way and try to actually think about visitors and their needs. As in make a straight route to a damn crosswalk instead of making it an obstacle course.

        • .Donuts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          What? No! You should be happy to even get any green to begin with.

          - Capitalism