The group responsible is “Collective Shout”, the same org has targeted Steam before.

There are calls on social media now to contact Mastercard, Visa and co. and file complaints.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    First they came for the incest/rape games, which most people somewhat agree with (although the principle is still wrong) Next up is all nsfw games. After that, it’ll be mainstream and indie games altogether. This never stops with just one “victory” for these groups.

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s going to come down to anything with even a whisper of LGBTQ+/minority/disability/etc representation, just like with books.

      They start with the “egregious” content (not that it’s necessarily right to remove that either), then narrow it down until it shapes up into hegemonic conformity and systemic oppression via media (there’s a term for it, kind of like stochastic violence but not quite that I can’t remember atm).

      • ugo@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Exactly this. It is so transparent that the goal is to target minorities and lgbtq+ folk. After that, who knows. “Unchristian” games probably.

        • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          it doesn’t even stop there - it will be used to punish people who do not exactly like it’s expected, with the mere accusation of playing/reading/watching/thinking something “unchristian” as reason.

    • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Yes, but.

      Everyone should read the open letter that’s linked in the itch statement, to have a fully informed opinion.

      There definitely is a line. Everyone can choose were they draw it. You don’t have to draw it in a way where you end up defending things that are kinda messed up.

      There is definitely a hill worth fighting on in that area. I don’t think it’s this exact one.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        My line is these payment processors being judge, jury and executioner about what material they deem valid. So I am fundamentally opposed.