Not really a meme meme, but i felt like i had to :s

  • shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    what even is the point of this cyberpunk dystopia if there won’t even be good porn to wank to?

  • percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wonder how long this will last. The NSFW industry is insanely huge. If the current payment processors cut it off, that leaves a giant gap in the market just waiting to get filled (😏).

    If they hold firm on this, it might just be a rare opportunity for a new (and hopefully better) payment processor to enter the market.

    Or maybe just wider crypto adoption, idk.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Collective Shout happened, an australian organisation decided to wage global war on anything NSFW in games (so far), their key talking points are allegedly being feminist and anti-exploitation of women.

        i wonder if they asked the women they’re saying they’re protecting if they want that “protection”, or if they’re imagining that women just don’t make NSFW art

  • sprite0@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    i wonder if this is the shitgibbons in charge trying to drive up bitcoin prices seeing as how they just publicly bought a bunch of bitcoin.

    i know the payment processors have always been prudes but they are really doubling down and its only going to drive folks to crypto.

    edit: I don’t think it’s a good idea either but talk to anyone outside lemmy and ask if they understand the environmental impact of crypto and AI and they have no clue.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Bitcoin is really bad for using as currency, due to the fact that there is a permanent, public ledger of all transactions. Why would you want anyone you pay to be able to see and trace every transaction you’ve ever made? Pay rent in bitcoin, now your landlord can calculate your spending and who you do transactions with. And yes, there are services that aggregate and obfuscate transactions in order to make them less traceable, but now you’ve just reinvented the same centralized payment processor system that the whole thing is supposed to be replacing… so… what’s the point?

      Cash is good for using as currency.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        so… what’s the point?

        The point isn’t anonymity, but independence and autonomy. It’s hard to shut down and hard to tax. The banks/governments can’t freeze your bitcoins, nor can they simply print more or regulate the value otherwise.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          The banks/governments can’t freeze your bitcoins, nor can they simply print more or regulate the value otherwise.

          You’re just listing reasons why bitcoin sucks lol. Oh no!!! Flight risk criminals and terrorists had their accounts frozen!!! Oh no, ReGuLaTiOn BaD!!! Grow up.

          Finite currencies (like gold/silver/bitcoin) are deflationary currencies and are genuinely absolutely terrible for an economy. That’s why we don’t use gold anymore.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            “Flight risk criminals and terrorists had their accounts frozen!!!”

            Yes, those criminals, for example, LGBT people who conservatives believe are pornographic simply for existing. God forbid LGBT artists want to have a way of earning a living. Crypto is relied on by a lot of marginalized groups. It’s used by artists who make perfectly legal art, but whose content conservatives object to. Crypto is used by many queer content creators as they face being cut off from payment processing systems, as again, conservatives consider queer people pornographic simply for existing. Crypto is used by sex workers, often people with few other employment options. Oh, and crypto is used by trans people to get access to healthcare that is quickly being criminalized.

            How insane do you have to be, in 2025 Trump’s America, to fall back on the idea that anything criminal is bad. Republicans are trying to criminalize the existence of entire swathes of the population. And those people face being cut off from the banking system entirely, if folks like you, who blindly consider legality=morality, have their way.

              • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                How are those related? It is possible for some conservatives to want to purge LGBT voices from the internet at the same time other conservatives want to advance crypto. These are not mutually exclusive goals.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    So, this means that pretty much any paid adult content can’t accept visa, right? Or are they just stomping in the small creators for not being profitable enough?

    Looking at you, OnlyFans…

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      For now, they are targeting more niche “taboo” kinks like incest and bdsm. But as we’ve seen time and time again with bigoted, puritanical christofascists, they will not stop there. Next, they come for the queer content. My guess is furry stuff is next under the bad faith argument of “bestiality”, then more standard queer content, including tame non-erotic content. Finally, all erotic content.

      Remember, everything sexual is sinful and evil unless its a straight white cis Christian married couple having joyless missionary sex for the purposes of procreation only.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        They’re already attacking furry content featuring “animal-esque genitalia”, as there were people who thought that was “zoophilic”. However, I still remember how much anime fans needed to fight, so that kemonomimi (catgirls, etc.) wouldn’t been labeled as “zoophilic”, which might be the source for the furry/anime divide in the west.

  • Meursault@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    So, why doesn’t some other payment processor step in to fill in the demand gap that the others are willfully abdicating?

    • sprite0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      the economic moat of regulations and infrastructure that has to be overcome before you even can start acquiring customers. You would need a massive capital outlay just to start in last position to compete. Then you have to pay your sydadmins and sales and help desk and administration for how long before you have enough customers to break even? all on a gamble that the government won’t hamstring you on behalf of their corporate sponsors. and who is to say the rest of the financial world won’t cut you off; you can’t process payments if you can’t access users banks, it’s all cooperative between entities that benefit from it being a small club.

      all of this risk to capture the relatively small nsfw market looks like a bad gamble to me, even though i strongly support the nsfw market myself! I spent decades in e-commerce and nsfw ecommerce and it’s trickier than it might look.

  • amikulo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I was worried that this could make bitcoin seem useful but other people in here are explaining why bitcoin would still be an awful solution for this.

    So… are we going back to cash and checks? Will people need to mail envelopes of cash to furry vore artists?

    • Atlas_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Bitcoin wouldn’t be an awful solution to this, but there’s certainly a few better ones, such as

      • Visa and MC just being the opinionless payment providers they ought to be.
      • Regulation enforcing all payment providers to be similarly opinionless.
      • Ethereum, or another crypto more suited to many, fast payments
      • A layer-2 network over Bitcoin that can enable many fast payments, such as the lightning network.
  • niva@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t get it. Will they also ban sex shops, adult cinemas and every other offline adult entertainment thing that exist?

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Man. I remember being a kid and dreaming about a world where puritans got laughed out of existence. Then we had the “woke” era which shocked me sideways. I never dreamed that progressive thinking people would get hung up on regressive shit like policing language, it reminded me of being in church as a kid and hearing about those dreaded, awful, naughty words. But hey, at least their goals were well meaning and driven by empathy and concern for how other people have it in this world.

          Who did they piss off though? The fucking puritans. The very people who policed language all of my childhood. It turns out that nothing ever meant anything to them, they just wanted to control people. “Don’t tell me I can’t call a little person a midget! Bad words is fuck and shit! Not me making fun of people!!!” One group said, “if it’s fun it’s bad.” The other group said, “if anyone is hurt by it, it’s bad.”

          Now the puritans have gone full fascist because they felt like they were losing some culture war, so they want it all, and they scream loud enough to be heard.

          It’s like this tug of war that is just going to end with regular people who don’t raise hell when they get upset being shoved into the dirt by a loud crybaby minority of people.

          Before I had any grasp of history, I just assumed that people were always heading toward being more liberal in how they deal with the world.

          Nope, this is what we do. We have cycles of enlightenment and cycles of assholes responding to said enlightenment. Somebody always has to be morally superior, fighting some ugly enemy. If we ran out of reasons to fight tomorrow, we’d just argue over some other dumb shit.

          I’m drunk, so please don’t take me too seriously. I’ll probably wake up tomorrow and argue with myself about deleting this comment haha.

          Whatever happens, I really hope we have freedom at the end of the day. I don’t care what it costs. Maybe we aren’t meant to have it. Maybe our nature is just too ugly.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Imagine how many more “Thomas Matthew Crooks” are gonna come out of their basements if you ban their porn. Conservatives secretly love their porn. Might wanna rethink the ban.

    Or not, I don’t mind watching a IRL live movie about a rebellion instigated by…

    checks notes

    …banning porn 🤦‍♂️🤣

    • StellarSt0rm@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I think they’re mostly spamming, i checked the mod logs (Which you can do! Click on the three dots of a comment then click on “<Name> Moderation History” i think) and they’re mostly spammers from what the mod’s reasons for banning is.