

Do you know that one characteristic of fascism is the forcible suppression of the opposition ?
Yet you’re suggesting that killing every trump voter should be on the agenda ?
Do you know that one characteristic of fascism is the forcible suppression of the opposition ?
Yet you’re suggesting that killing every trump voter should be on the agenda ?
I do believe that he deserved to die
One characteristic of fascism is the forcible suppression of opposition. By your statement which mentions that someone can « deserve to die » because of his political view opposed to your, in my opinion you’re more fascist than him. Or maybe I misunderstood you.
So far I saw videos of him debating, asking to be proven wrong. I don’t remember any quote of him saying something so violent as « someone deserve to die because xxx ». Knowing that trump got elected with less votes than during his 1st term, in the end one might argue that Kirk did a poor job.
Everyone who voted for Trump helped him to come into power. Is it ok to assassinate every trump voter ?
Whataboutism. As much as I disagreed with him, I don’t remember Kirk being a dictator, invading countries, killing his opponents, etc. Remember the last time Mussolini and Putin were debating with public in « prove me wrong » mode ? No. Because it did not happen.
As much as I disagreed with him, I don’t remember Kirk killing millions, building concentration camps, starving people to death.
I’m sorry for his death. I disagreed with most of his points, I’m not event from the USA, but I hate seeing people celebrating the assassination of someone. What a fucked up world.
After your comment, I documented myself on the techniques behind his debate techniques, watched multiple videos, found this one being the most educational : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9O7y50cNb7c&pp=ugUHEgVlbi1HQg%3D%3D
You were right. There is no way to prove him wrong with all those techniques. However, I still do not think he deserved to die.