Beg your pardon. Bo’oh o’ wa’ah

You forgot “bo’oh ‘o wa’er”

Okay then

Thanks for noticing me, Senpai.

It wasn’t me, I swear.

https://lemmy.today/comment/18397391

Was that necessary?

Pretty sure not owning ANY broadcast receiving devices is the only way to get around it, but that’s extremely difficult to accomplish. Keep in mind radio counts as well (though you can be eligible for a reduced rate if you only have radio access and no TV), including the one in your car, your stereo, or your alarm clock. Owning a TV with no antenna hooked up does not count either, since it’s trivial to do so, and you could just be hiding an antenna in your attic or your basement.

Basically, the only way to legally skirt the fee is to live under a bridge or in a forest without any electronic devices besides a flash lamp.

I’m surprised that according to the website, they actually let you get away without a license if you only use commercial streaming services and don’t watch any BBC content. In Germany, that excuse doesn’t fly. As long as your device has the capacity to receive aerial broadcast, you have to pay, whether you watch it or not is irrelevant.

Thx m8

It was already like this when I found it.

Fellas, is it gay if you’re male and you sleep by yourself?

Yes, constable. This bloke right here.

U wot m8?

The TV license is definitely real. All the others are fake though (I believe).

https://www.gov.uk/find-licences/tv-licence

British colloquial term for constable

And here you are accusing me of strawmanning…

Explain how feminism helps men achieve positive behavioral change if it systematically discards any evidence of their capacity for such.

So why is it the self-proclaimed feminists in here who are pushing back the hardest on anon’s claims?

You’d think they would embrace this as evidence that #NotAllMen are violent and sexist, yet they’re fighting me tooth and nail on it.

Is so

It does when it comes down to popularity.