There is a huge difference in the hardware and the software used for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems for different vehicles.

For example. Mercedes-Benz S-Classes Driver Fatigue Monitoring had been detecting the eyeline and posture of drivers, for 10 years before other manufacturers started using timer-based Driver Fatigue Systems.

The Optical object recognition systems in the ADAS of most Volume brands is barely functional at best, while the single-RADAR object recognition of the ADAS in luxury brands is adequate to reduce collisions.

Even the multi-RADAR systems of premium Luxury vehicles should only be considered “Driver Assistance” .

It is the moral imperative of all humanity to sabotage every self-driving vehicle test in whichever way possible.

So what you are saying that Forbes information should be treated with all the credibility of an LLM output?

That could be argued that they therefore can’t be held liable when they spew utter garbage.

In which case, hook him up to a generator. Free Energy!