I agree with you, but just to be that person:

To know something is poisonous, somebody had to have eaten it at least once.

Ja das ist richtig dumm gelöst. Wenn ich 6 freie Plätze im sonst vollen Zug sehe, habe ich kein Verständnis dafür, diese Plätze frei zu lassen, nur falls doch ein Statuskunde kommt und da sitzen möchte.

Kann man so sehen oder anders.

Es gibt genau keinen Grund für mich die russischen Städte unbedingtzu sehen, ich habe ja selbst Deutschland bisher nur sehr spärlich erkundet.

Ich hoffe so sehr, dass das zu meinen Lebzeiten nochmal ethisch vertretbar ist. Russland hat viele schöne Landschaften und interessante Städte.

I only got it by the explanation in the fourth panel, but I also live in a country with general healthcare, so maybe that other commentator is right.

You completely missed the point.

You complained in a pretty smug way about science not being fast enough.

Problems often don’t have easy solutions or they would have been already found. Finding solutions which fulfill all or at least most requirements takes time. If you don’t like that, start contributing. But just sitting there and complaining that it doesn’t work like a video game where X research happens after Y time is just stupid.

Criticism is fine. But you just wanted to feel smug as e evident by the way of your comment.

I mean, you are free to go into the lab and research your own selectively recognising, non-toxic, stable, easy to use chemical. Shouldn’t take you long since you are such an expert.