Competing for grades is so dumb, really glad to have school far behind me
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•This how the Governor of Oregon wants to finance her transportation plan English1·1 day agoTransportation spending isn’t just gas costs, I bet a lot of this is accounted for by how much more you can spend on newer, fancier cars, or even air travel.
Also note that driving is highly subsidized, and if the gas tax isn’t raised to cover those costs then that money still has to come from somewhere. And that somewhere is other government programs, which low-income are much more highly dependent on.
Sure, I agree, again, I’m not arguing against a gas tax, I’m in favor of it because it’s necessary, just saying that it should be acknowledged that it disproportionately affects the poor and that fact should be addressed in its implementation.
Maybe he was talking about the Canadian border, that’s the one adjacent to Vermont
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•This how the Governor of Oregon wants to finance her transportation plan English5·2 days agoSorry, but unless you are disabled…nobody is obligated to drive.
There are degrees of obligation. The amount poor people would have to sacrifice in order to not drive is more. That’s how ‘regressiveness’ works.
USDOT statistics show wealthy and poor people have very similar cost burden (as percent of household budget) when it comes to gas costs
This is hard to believe because there is a maximum anyone could reasonably drive, a higher end income would dwarf the cost of that, there is a tradeoff between housing costs and commute distance (best way to avoid driving is living in an expensive city), genuinely wealthy people don’t have to commute anyway, etc. could you link the source on this?
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•This how the Governor of Oregon wants to finance her transportation plan English12·2 days agoA gas tax makes sense because it directly pressures consumer behavior towards using less gas and producing less emissions, but it’s still technically regressive because poor people are more obligated to drive and gas costs are a larger proportion of their budget. The way to make it not regressive would be to redistribute the revenue.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Texas Schools Add Attack Drones To Protect StudentsEnglish29·3 days agocan fly through double-paned glass
um, how
Also I wonder how long it will take before this tech gets used for situations other than mass murder events
various forms of explicitly engineered right wing political propaganda last I checked
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Human civilization won't last forever; someday there will be a last movie ever made5·4 days agoI bet they will keep making movies after we’re gone
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Games@lemmy.world•"We approached payment processors because Steam did not respond" - Australian pressure group Collective Shout claims responsibility for Steam and Itch.io NSFW game removalEnglish5·4 days agoKind of inevitable when automated moderation becomes the norm
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Games@lemmy.world•Gamers Bombard Visa & MasterCard With Emails and Calls Over Steam and itch.io CensorshipEnglish54·4 days agoSorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/Steam.
Hmmm
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What is something you never understood the hype for?6·5 days agoSupposedly vtubers need to make very exaggerated facial expressions irl in order to make sure the software picks it up and translates it onto the model, which is sometimes unsettling to people when they get in the habit of doing that normally.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What is something you never understood the hype for?28·5 days agoMobile UI. It sucks. Yet the majority of people online are now connecting from it, and everything wants to be an app.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Games@lemmy.world•Petition to tell MasterCard, Visa, and activist groups to stop censoring legal fictional contentEnglish41·5 days agoI wonder if the real reason credit card companies have been responsive to these groups is the potential for lawsuits that drag payment processors into them, which is a result of various shitty laws that have been passed to generally empower these sorts of regressive trolls to do so. If so petitions from the other side might not be as effective, because they can be sued for providing services to the wrong people but not so much for cutting off service, and there’s not much actual risk to them even if a lot of people are mad about the latter.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•[Cusor AI] apologizes after AI support agent invents policy that causes user uproar [in April 2025]English6·6 days agoOthers joined in: “Yep, I’m canceling as well, this is asinine.” Soon after, moderators locked the Reddit thread and removed the original post.
Yeah that checks out
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Comic Strips@lemmy.world•If You Needed to Pass an Exam to Vote0·6 days agothe main function of the contemporary media: to convey the message that even if you’re clever enough to have figured out that it’s all a cynical power game, the rest of America is a ridiculous pack of sheep.
This is the trap.
-David Graeber, The Democracy Project
Or if there is any possible ambiguity in the law. I’m thinking it’s possible this has something to do with the recent weakening of constitutional protections for adult content in the US, where censorship by states of somewhat arbitrarily “obscene” content can be deemed illegal. The quote in the article by Valve seems to reference the concept of offensiveness in Mastercard’s policies:
the rule including the text:
So what I’m reading between the lines here is, there is now doubt among the lawyers of credit card companies or the lawyers of their middlemen that these games are for sure legal, and not in violation of obscenity laws that rely on hazy standards of offensiveness.