Communist

none of those issues work because there is a whitelist of specific terms instead of a blacklist

-1 cannot be selected, a lizard isn’t on the list of inputs, and my point with the sql is that this isn’t a huge attack vector like an input field on a website, this is a dropdown list, essentially.

i challenge you to come up with one relevant attack that isn’t order too much of a thing or order conflicting modifications (note of course the modifications are also essentially read from a dropdown list)

everyone here seems to believe that the input field paradigm is not solveable when the inputs are fixed, that isn’t true.

No special characters, this is speech to text, inherently sanitized inputs.

This isn’t something you can input any text into, it’s fixed, that joke doesn’t apply, you can’t do an sql injection here.

If what I was saying was false, there would be the same issues with the touchscreen ones.

there is an incredibly finite number of ways to mess with this, they just need a button to send a report to the engineers with how they got messed with and eventually they’ll have a complete list. I really doubt it’d take long to iron out the vast majority of ways that can be thought of.

In software in general? Sure, here? I really doubt it

Tbh this is an incredibly easy fix, either cap the number of waters someone can order in software or have an override where a human takes over if an order is suspicious, there’s not an infinite number of ways to fuck with this.

They are absolutely on defence and i’m aware they are around, but the mexican government is actively trying to destroy them

you really didn’t realize that the fact that they’re still around undermines, not strengthens your argument huh?

If you mean the zapatistas… duhhh? They were an anarchist movement within a country, they were attacked by the country they were founded in, and their enforcers were held in rotation and decided on by a fully public discussion that anyone in the community could attend, this is fully anarchist.

Ah yes, such trivialities like the answer to your conundrum are meaningless to someone as proudly ignorant on a topic as yourself. My bad.

See: the zapatistas and revolutionary catalonia for examples of anarchist societies.

No they’re saying the spleen harvesters are NOT anarchists at all.

A democratic power structure is decentralized.

Give one historical example of this happening to an anarchist commune?

also anarchists have all of those legal frameworks in place as well, this is simply not true and has no historical basis.

In nearly every example I have read about they have been destroyed through military might of an external power, see revolutionary catalonia and the zapatistas as examples. It turns out rich capitalists don’t want anarchism to work, and desperately try to destroy it.

There is a legal recourse, you’re saying someone with power ignored the law and attempted a coup… do you think coups don’t happen in non anarchist countries? How is this unique to anarchism in any way?

The same thing that happens anywhere else? A power struggle between the people who want it and don’t? Are you implying this is unique to anarchism in some way? I don’t see why it would be.

No and I don’t see how that is relevant or comparable.

usually anarchists advocate for elected or rotational positions for policing.

you simultaneously hope that no anarchist philosophers agree with you, and use a definition that says

“the advocacy or practice of anarchistic principles”

Who established anarchistic principles, exactly, if not anarchists?

the definitions in the dictionary you provided conflict, how do you explain that, if not that they are not synonyms?