• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m a little bit surprised Rowling didn’t throw in something about some human technology not working in the wizarding world, like electronics and firearms. Surely this came up while the books were being written.

    • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      She all but stated that humanity is advancing beyond the wizarding world. There’s really no explanation beyond “wizards are actually very stupid and stagnating within their intellectually, and very literally, incestuous society.”

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Mr Weasley is seen as a weird oddball for engaging in studying muggle technology. The wizarding world sees it all as a bunch of pointless nonsense that muggles have to go through just because they don’t have magic. Clever in its own way, but utterly futile.

        Why spend hundreds of people’s effort, lots of money and enormous amounts of time to design, make and use a vehicle to go somewhere when you can hop in a fireplace and think about where you want to go, or simply apparate there?

        Why carry a complicated muggle weapon around and spend time and effort learning how to use it well, when you can kill someone with two words you’ve known since you were a child?

        Voldemort isn’t just protected by being a powerful wizard, he’s also protected by the bully’s standard protections of surrounding themselves with sycophants who unquestioningly support them (by ruthlessly turning against people who question their authority or judgment), having no moral hesitancy whatsoever and avoiding like the plague fair fights wherever there’s a chance they’d not win.

        So because of Voldemort’s followers who will turn up in an instant and his horcruxes, you have to be prepared to sacrifice your life to have a chance of opposing him openly, which is of course what Lily Potter did.

        Strange that JKR, who clearly didn’t like bullies, would choose to bully trans people and use her money and influence against them. Admittedly she clearly had a bit of a problem with blonde people before she wrote book 1, so not exactly completely free from prejudice.

        • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          If I could offer an additional perspective, one of the most fundamentally interesting aspects in the study of Paleolithic peoples to me is its occupants’ intense desire to choose the best tools. The best tools for fighting, the best tools for crafting, the best tools for presenting, the best tools for fucking, etc…

          You’ll often find items from far and wide in their caches. Stones and gems and shells and bones, and yes I encourage you to make the joke, from a hundred miles away, all brought painstakingly back despite local resources being nearly comparable. It’s a fundamentally human characteristic to aggregate useful peculiarities, and neglecting them is new.

          The wizards are losing touch with their humanity, if we take this story written by a troubled schoolteacher literally.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        For all we know the hogwarts express runs on magic and so does the car, after all it flies.

      • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Pretty sure wizards are familiar with old technology like trains and cars. But like another comment said, muggles are advancing while wizards stagnate in their old ways and traditions and shit since they keep themselves so separated.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 days ago

          Combustion is very old technology. Putting it inside a different machine (e.g. a gun or a car engine) doesn’t change the chemistry. If you want to get right down to it, we’re just talking about oxidation - which means that in any sort of world where rapid oxidation doesn’t work (i.e. explosives), your lungs also don’t work because you need that oxygen bonding with the iron in your hemoglobin or you die.

          If you can light a fire, you can make an explosion. If you can make an explosion, you can use it to launch a projectile.

          There’s no world in which fire exists but guns are impossible. Even if you don’t have the metalworking sophistication for a modern gun, you could still make a Chinese-style gunpowder rocket.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Or just straight up bombs. The beauty is that an IED can catch even a master wizard off guard. No need for metalworking, and since they use cars, well… surely there is some character with Irish roots, right?

          • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            This is a world with flying broomsticks and cars, teleportation, and even time travel.

            Of course you can get away with saying gunpowder just doesn’t explode here.

            • icelimit@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Gunpowder is just fire propagating at the speed of sound through solid (powder). As long as sound exists, the magical world can’t contain the angry dust.

            • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              No, they’re a combustion event. An actual explosion (detonation, pre ignition) is really bad news for an engine.

              Firearms use a self oxidising propellant, so it would be quite easy to say that just doesn’t work.

              • rtxn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                What, pray tell, do you think is in gunpowder? It’s not magic dust that goes bang. It’s a pre-mixed, pre-compressed mixture of fuel and oxidiser. When used in a gun, whether it’s a muzzle-loader or a cartridge, the confined combustion of the mixture generates thermal energy and expanding gases that impart kinetic energy on a moving component (the piston or a projectile). The only difference is that the combustion event in an ICE is subsonic (deflagration) while the combustion in a gun is supersonic (detonation).

                • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  @Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works is correct.

                  I should’ve done my homework before going all “well akshullay 🤓” on them (sorry!).

                  The only similarities between the two is that they both are chemical reactions that produce a rapid release of energy. But past that, they are much different in how they get to that point.

                • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The only difference is that the combustion event in an ICE is subsonic (deflagration) while the combustion in a gun is supersonic (detonation).

                  So what you’re saying is there’s a fundamental difference between the two?

                  • rtxn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 days ago

                    Yes, there are differences. That’s why one is called deflagration and the other is called detonation. Good job, you can read. But the chemical and thermodynamic processes are identical, and that’s what you seem to misunderstand.

          • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Nope, there’s a fundamental difference between a fuel/air mixture burning and something like gunpowder, which is a self oxidising propellant. Most explosives are in the latter category.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Explosions are combustion.

          And really we’re just talking about oxidation. If oxidation works (which it must, because the characters are breathing) then chemically-propelled projectiles must also work.

    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Iirc it is mentioned electricity is finicky. But given that fire works, it stands to reason all chemical reactions work. Ergo firearms.

    • absentbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I hate JKR too, but she literally did. Wizard clothes are enchanted with protego charms which turn away any mundane attacks, and wizards really have no reason to fear muggles. During the witch trials some would allow themselves to be burned at the stake because they liked how the flames tickle. It’s very much a ‘magic must defeat magic’ setting.

      • Tuxman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t remember which book but I also have this clear memory of a quick passage saying all the magic around them was messing up with electronics.

        Also I’m pretty sure in the Deathly Hallows they use the internet to follow Death Eaters sighting while they are in hiding

        (Been a while… and I’m not bothered enough to go check 🤣)

        • starchylemming@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          its either directly in the books refering guns specifically or… it might have been an official out of the books source.

          i used to be interested in this shit over a decade ago when the last books weren’t yet finished: there was a fancy flash based official site where lore snippets and bullshit from jk got published

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also Arcanum a CRPG by troika, there’s a newspaper you can find where someone tried to put a fire enchantment on a musket took out a city block.