• Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    What is the acceptable amount of dead children, that if kept at that level makes letting people drive gigantic emotional support trucks worth it?

    • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      “You know what I’ve noticed? Nobody panics when things go ‘according to plan’. Even if the plan is horrifying! If, tomorrow, I tell the press that, like, a gang banger will get shot, or a truckload of soldiers will be blown up, nobody panics, because it’s all ‘part of the plan’. But when I say that one little old mayor will die, well then everyone loses their minds.”

    • Grilipper54@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well none would be the best obviously but that isn’t acknowledging reality. In my city we have a mandatory 25 mph max speed limit in residential neighborhoods and it is highly enforced. Policy changes can prevent these situations.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I agree that policy changes can prevent these children’s deaths. Speed limits are a nice start, but we can do better. Size limits for personal vehicles, investment in public transit and pedestrian infrastructure, repealing the myriad laws that enforce car dependency such as parking requirements, increased density and reduced zoning restrictions, banning cars in city centers, etc.