This makes it read like the likelihood of a god existing is 50/50. In reality, based on evidence, its much closer to 100% chance there’s no god; 0% chance there is one.
That wasn’t what I was implying, but I can see how it could be read that way.
I was more making the point that, while TECHNICALLY possible for there to be a God-like being out there (see simulation theory, for example), the likelihood is remote, so you shouldn’t concern yourself with it and assume there isn’t.
I mean… That’s basically what I said.
Apologies, my point was not clear enough.
My response was aimed at your first sentence:
This makes it read like the likelihood of a god existing is 50/50. In reality, based on evidence, its much closer to 100% chance there’s no god; 0% chance there is one.
That wasn’t what I was implying, but I can see how it could be read that way.
I was more making the point that, while TECHNICALLY possible for there to be a God-like being out there (see simulation theory, for example), the likelihood is remote, so you shouldn’t concern yourself with it and assume there isn’t.