• manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Alright, I hear you, but I think the point is that a cyclist running a red light mostly endangers themselves, while a car running a red light endangers others. Here in Colorado, we changed the laws such that a red light is a stop sign for bicycles, and a stop sign a yield, in recognition of the differences in risk. (Edit: cars -> bicycles)

    • JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s assuming that an oncoming car wouldn’t swerve at all if a cyclist entered their path. Dangerous or unpredictable behavior by anyone on a road puts everyone in the area at risk.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yes, and nobody disputes that some bicyclists put everyone at risk. The point of the article, though, is that drivers are handed a fine, while bicyclists are handed criminal charges. Pointing out that bicyclists are given harsher treatment for a less dangerous offense is, I think, fair in this case.