It showed up out of nowhere, made the most bank in history (for a movie), refused to explain and disappeared for like 15 years, then came back out of nowhere with a sequel movie, a AAA game, and like 3 more movies in the works.

Edit: I think it now has like a Lego line too?

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Given that they could accelerate masses to relativistic speeds. It never made sense to me why they bothered to do anything other than shatter the planet (a Chevy engine block could do that job at those speeds) and then collect the now more readily available unobtainium from the vacuum of space with no fighting required or any loses of any kind.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Eyup. Pretty much. There was something about Pandora being the only planet with life they found, and since Earth cannot sustain life anymore…

          This was explained in the second movie.

          • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            But the moon itself supports life just fine (we contaminated it back when we landed on the moon); we have grown plants on the moon successfully. Are the sci-fi writers explicitly ignoring what we have known for decades to justify a poorly thought out plan to do a search and replace movie?

            • Tattorack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              The Moon isn’t a pressurised environment with a full ecosystem. And considering how developed and gridlocked Earth is, and that interstellar travel is possible, why do you assume the moon hasn’t already been colonised?

              Or Mars? Or Titan?

              An artificial ecosystem doesn’t, and will never, compare to an organically evolved one.

              • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Honestly, a swarm of O’Neil cylinders would have more surface area than the planet Earth and need less mass than one of Mars’ moons. That would be vastly superior to even a duplicate Earth of nothing but nature preserves

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nah. Even if you had the ability to shatter a planet (it would take a lot more mass hitting the planet than that of every automobile ever made) it would just clump back together after a while because, ya know, gravity. And now you’ve sloshed everything around in a molten mess so it’s even harder to process.