Future? No Thanks! was meant to be announced weeks ago but the Steam page didn’t pass the first review because a screenshot marked as “Suitable for all ages” had suggestive themes.
The screenshot? This one
Source.
Steam reviewers under pressure from anti-porn bigots:
Source.
Shes got a titty split in her shirt. Why put that in there if its for all ages? Children dont care if the characters are sexy so they dont need to be.
Frankly ive seen worse in nintendo games, namely the fairy fountains in ocarina of time.
That was also in the '90s, before people could be bothered to give half a shit. Fresh off the 80s Masters of the Universe style. It still wasn’t cool for kids back then. No reason for her to have a revealing vine fit. Tangent, but I still hear all that music in my head constantly. It slaps.
They also didnt tone it down at all for the 3ds re-master(?) of it.
Oh for real? I didn’t play that. Part of me says preserve it as it was and part of me says they had the chance and still chose horny.
Tell that to my younger self when I first saw Veronica Rabbit
Jessica Rabbit?
Yeah, probably not this one:
https://bunniculatvseries.fandom.com/wiki/Veronica_Rabbit
Hey, we don’t kink shame here 😆.
Yes. Hell…
I had access to Newgrounds and Kongregate. yet I still chose the non-porn games. So not every kid is the same.
breasts aren’t inherently sexual. what she’s wearing is just clothing
When you cut a big diamond to show them it is.
If you think this is problematically sexual you are the problem.
They said it should be rated for everyone. Do you think a five year old should play this? Do you think showing your voluptuous side boob is necessary in an E rated game? I think its fine in a T rated game. But I dont need my kids asking why the therapist is showing her boobs to off-duty Santa Clause