• roastedpotato@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    How do you feel about rural roads? Should we not build them unless we can make them profitable?

    • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Highly-used roads are even less profitable since they need expensive repairs much more often.

      To your point, though, the idea that every service has to make a profit is most of what’s wrong with me modern society.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        The very approach to calculating “profit” is backwards.

        We’re not measuring the economic value ad of the lane of transit. We’re measuring the margin between cost of the lane and the immediate rent produced.

        Concepts like “hours lost in transit” or “physical harm from accidents” goes entirely out the window. Negative externalities are never measured by capitalist economics.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Not sure that’s the same. Dumping a bunch of gravel is far cheaper and less wasteful than a rail line.

      Edit: I will add that I don’t agree that profitability should be the foremost consideration when it comes to building public infrastructure.

    • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      If rural roads were a high cost investment meant to transport very large crowds and very large amounts of cargo to a place lacking such needs? And if we had a much cheaper alternative capable of running vehicles meant of transporting smaller crowds and small amounts of cargo? Then yea, we should not build those rural roads