In the EU, 76% of the population live in urban regions. That’s 76% where it’s really easy to have people live within 10 minutes of public transport.
In cities like Vienna, that figure is already close to 100%.
And in sparsely populated areas, impossible.
Luckily, by definition, not a lot of people live in sparsely populated areas. And also luckily, the figure we are talking about is “percentage of the population”, not “percentage of the land area”.
That’s why you have the 80% figure and not 100%.
In the EU, 76% of the population live in urban regions. That’s 76% where it’s really easy to have people live within 10 minutes of public transport.
In cities like Vienna, that figure is already close to 100%.
Luckily, by definition, not a lot of people live in sparsely populated areas. And also luckily, the figure we are talking about is “percentage of the population”, not “percentage of the land area”.
Fun fact: in the US, the percentage is even higher, at 80%.
Something to remember next time some troll tries to claim that EU-style public transit can’t work in the US because we’re too spread out.
Why are you ignoring the qualifiers already provided by me and the previous commenter?
Two qualifiers that just don’t make sense in the context.
?? You basically just repeated them.
Do you think I’m against more trains or something?