Formerly u/CanadaPlus101 on Reddit.

  • 0 Posts
  • 45 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle






  • Cancel all Microsoft Office contracts. Cancel all Microsoft Windows contracts. Switch all government departments and Crown corporations to Linux.

    Yeah, this is the national government that can’t even hire someone else to make an app effectively. Decades of cutting “wasteful bureaucracy” in the IT field has left them a sitting duck. They need to build that back, and then maybe we can discuss it in 10 years.

    Announce $100 million fund to support Open Source software such as Krita, Gimp, Inkscape. Time to assassinate Adobe.

    Bruh, we don’t even know how we’re going to pay for the things we already have as the US implodes our economy. And we have a housing crisis.

    Ban all government departments from using foreign consulting firms. No more McKinsey or Bain.

    More doable, although I’d go for more avoid than totally ban. Absolutes like that tend to run up against the nuance of whatever small procurement.

    Cancel all F-35 jet orders. It’s better to have 5 F-16 than 1 plane that can’t fly.

    We already paid.

    Put all the top 50 executives from Fox News on a no-travel list. Put their spouses on the list.

    A bit arbitrary (why not the Trumps themselves?) but sure.

    Do they even have 50 top-level executives, though?






  • I mean, the pyramids are huge, and they were built starting ~2500BC. There was stuff.

    It’s true that in any discussion of today’s economics versus that in history (or in very different countries today) you run into the problems of an apples-to-oranges comparison. It’s most common for economic historians to default to hours of unskilled labour; early economists like Marx or Smith would be proud. Archeologists meanwhile tend to use house size in settlements as a proxy. That leads to ideas like the bronze age “palace economy” where all wealth would have flown through the ruler, although one wonders how that could possibly have been implemented in practice. When it comes to comparing modern global inequality, the best measurements are multidimensional indices, but that’s only possible because you can interact with people on the ground in real time. (No, two dollars a day isn’t the same everywhere)

    Although there’s some dissent, the gist that pre-modern history included much higher levels of inequality than we see today holds. Here’s a recent example. Here’s an old AskHistorians reply about it, by alternate frontend.

    There’s is some interesting comparisons out there. In certain periods and areas, medieval peasants were eating pretty well; much better than the modern global poorest, probably because of there was a lot of land relative to the local population. One the other hand, the poorest countries today have better infant mortality than the richest countries of the early 20th century.

    Historical acts of oppression were often far more brutal and cruel but that’s because it wasn’t physically possible to maintain the constant, but relatively minor oppression that is characteristic of modernity.

    Pragmatism might have had something to do with that, as did unfounded beliefs about the effectiveness of draconian punishments (the English bloody code being an infamous example). There’s no shortage of examples of historical suffering handed out on a consistent rather than occasional basis, though.




  • Rome didn’t treat it’s lower classes and actual slaves very well from the start, though. Nor did the rulers before them or the feudal splinter states after them. I’ve had an actual historian of Rome tell me point blank nobody has any idea why it started to decline. Historically, scholars have pointed at too much generosity with the privileges of citizenship and senatorial appointments of those from humble backgrounds.

    I think it’s fair to say that usually the peasants know they’re being screwed. Very rarely, the aristocracy has been complacent enough it develops into an actual movement, but before the French revolution it always ends like the English peasant’s revolt: it’s crushed, and everything goes back to normal. It’s kind of weird it’s worked better since then, really.

    (There was also more than one financial crisis in the Rome, but that’s neither here nor there)