FishFace

An ai model can’t “sabotage attempts to shut it down” if it’s not plugged into mechanisms that can actually do that.

“gamer culture” was not adopted by the mainstream; video games were. The culture of mainstream gamers remains distinct from the old culture

What makes you say this is going into her profit? There’s a lot of competition in coffee shops, so if what you say it’s true there’ll be someone undercutting her.

It’s more likely that besides beans her other costs have gone up, too.

It also doesn’t make sense to maintain absolute profits instead of a percentage margin. Low margin means that you aren’t hedging as much against risk (if your stock is destroyed in a fire you have to pay the cost of the stock, which has increased) and aren’t paying yourself any more in the face of the rising costs YOU are paying every day.

This idea does not adequately address reality.

Presumably the difference is how many people are using one for work.

Anyway, you imply you’re completely fine with 70% of the population having no access to the uncensored internet?

How does the FBI compare to the federal/national police forces of other countries that makes it more susceptible?

Hmm, yes. I think we’ve covered all the facts here XD

I put wooden stuff in the dishwasher and it’s fine.

Do not do this to formal wear

Oh, so he doesn’t like it when statements and adverts might influence matters in his country.

Interesting.

I mean you still touched a boob which is nice

It’s about 3% according to Wikipedia, meaning that government internet censorship works on 97% of people in this way. That means the 3% also can’t discuss what they learn with anyone except online.

If that’s your remaining objection then sure.

When I make that comment I was thinking of a single office.

Shows the importance of having a human in the loop.

And since the police vetted the image properly they shouldn’t be afraid of publishing it, right?

Even if infinitely many guests want to stay put, as long as for every room, there is a later room willing to move, you’re OK.

I’m part of a distributed team which already makes this information available to everyone. It means when you go to message someone and it says they’re in the same office as you that you can just go and talk to them.

Right. Everyone. But only a minority of Chinese use vpns, and it’s a fraction of those who use them for anything other than work, from what I’ve found.

What strikes me is that this article would never have been written had the FBI not acknowledged the truth. We’re still reliant on the institutions that are being corrupted to help document the corruption…

Why is carol bitching about what she can see on teams that she can’t see looking around the office already?

Sounds useful? Weird to imply the purpose of this is to expose people not in the office. The people who care about that already know.

Does the average republican believe the government’s characterisation of this as the fault of the democrats? What about the average American?