

Tbf, England doesn’t have a good track record when it comes to returning culturally significant items …


Tbf, England doesn’t have a good track record when it comes to returning culturally significant items …


Against a government with modern weaponry? Yes.


So you understood what I was getting at? Language is descriptive, not proscriptive. People who make fun of others for jargon or misuse typically don’t have much going for their argument or position.
Also, see here: https://www.dailywritingtips.com/ferment-and-foment/


I see u! How much are they paying you to ferment chaos?


But is he powerful enough to create a rock so heavy that even he can’t lift it?
It’s not the “party” that matters… It’s who is giving money to the party. Sometimes it takes a minute for the donors to settle on the same horse.
She’s a stooge and a useful idiot… She doesn’t have the ear of anyone important. Hell, i don’t think she’s on any legislative committees, which tells me nobody important is backing her.
Edit: just looked at the committees she’s a part of. Her only appointment of note is being chair of DOGE…i rest my case.


I would suggest not relying on Mater to fix the gun problems. He is an international spy but I don’t think he’s got the tools to fix this problem…


I would bring up the fact that the US needs to do something about access to firearms… But unfortunately it’s"too soon." I sure don’t want to disrespect the dead and injured by discussing solutions to the problem that resulted in their death and misery…
Charlie Kirk’s old couch ain’t going to fuck itself.