• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Using data such as a person’s geolocation or their phone battery to determine how much to upcharge them for a good or service further exacerbates this issue of affordability for our affiliate members and for workers,” Fernandez said.

    This person is in a shitty neighborhood and about to be trapped there. Quick! Let’s just up the price by 300%!

    -Asshole Executives

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    In a functioning society it would already be illegal because of the discriminatory pricing.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      In a functioning society those who even attempted this would be beaten to death. There would be no second chances.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately, “people who need to charge their phone” is not a protected class.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Maybe not, but Uber should know what they’re doing when they’re targeting people who use economy handsets and integrating additional information. They’re trying to select the vulnerable people which is against the spirit of it. But indeed.

      • unconsequential@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Perhaps not, but we can all agree that’s a form of predatory capitalism and it’s unethical. Not to mention a massive invasion of privacy.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why is the OS even making that info available to them? That should require at the very least explicit consent (maybe a, like, “hey, dickhead, let us know how desperate you are so we can charge you more up the ass” alert)

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can imagine an engineer working on the OS going “we’ll expose battery info via this API. Responsible developers can then use this to, like, turn off battery intensive operations when the charge is low”. Something naive and optimistic like that

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s an extremely rare vector for any sort of attack. I’m sure people didn’t consider the most evil of evil abusing it in these kind of scenarios.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Uhh they could make their app waste your battery more and create free money?

    Sounds pretty dumb to me.

    • tetrachromacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, Uber and Lyft both use a crapload of battery when it’s trying to sync me with a driver. I can see rideshare apps shuffling you around to different drivers until the battery is really low, only to swoop in at 15% to find you a driver at 3x the price. What are you gonna do, not take it?

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What are you gonna do, not take it?

        That’s exactly what I would do. I would just use public transit because my country isn’t a capitalist hellscape. But Uber and Lyft can’t even get licensed here because every driver needs a valid taxi license.