• Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And this just cements the fact that you can’t read. You’re not original, because your dumb misinterpreted study has been posted and debunked to hell and back.

    The person I just celebrated an anniversary with would be very amused to read this. And like me, she’d recognize

    And you’re also delusional. I’m not surprised.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      your dumb misinterpreted study has been posted and debunked to hell and back.

      1. Show me the alleged debunking. Claiming it exists while seething at me is not convincing. If it’s the same argument made by that other person, I already broke it down and showed how it doesn’t hold water, so make sure not to repeat it.
      2. Actually, now that I think about it, it’s ironically you that can’t read by your definition of literacy, because you failed to understand that it was a hypothetical analogy to begin with, that works just fine even if said study didn’t even exist in the first place. The actual point all along is that it’s wrong, morally and practically, to generalize that way about the entirety of any demographic.

      But it seems all you’ve demonstrated proficiency in is slinging clumsy, unoriginal (more irony!) barbs.

      And you’re also delusional. I’m not surprised.

      You know what’s extra ironic about your reply? It was literally my partner getting my attention for a moment that broke my train of thought and resulted in me not completing that sentence. Of course, now it’s best not to fix it until after I share this exchange with her, it’ll make her reading this part extra amusing. :)