Every time I hear someone say ‘eh’ in a questioning tone or to mean ‘um actually’ I lose my shit. Or even just to play something down.

Like I literally come to hate the person instantly. Its a very strong feeling on a very small sound.

Instant downvotes if I see it on Lemmy too. HATE IT.

How about all y’all?

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Boys will be boys.”

    Fuck you Tom! That’s how you react to your brat violating the bodily autonomy of another human beeing!? Hearing you say that means he feels it’s normal, he’s got permission and that it’s good masculine behavior. You’re teaching your son to be an asshole instead of a functioning human being. Boys will behave better if we teach them to, so you better pick up the slack and join the rest of us in raising your fucking child!

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    When talking politics:

    “It’s plain as day” “Common sense” “I don’t know about that” “We all know” “It’s just natural” “Normal” “Everybody (verbs) (x)”

    Like that kind of stuff irks me in normal conversations but when we are talking about something that is part of common debate, obviously it’s fucking not already known “common sense”, and dismissing evidence that clearly contradicted it by saying “I don’t about that” or similar just sends me.

    It’s a problem with trolls, strangers, and even loved ones for me. It’s just wild

  • jaycifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Most people think ___.” No, unless you’re citing a statistic or roughly quantifying how many anecdotes you’ve heard agreeing with you to support that statement (both of which rarely happen), that’s just your opinion wrapped up in language to avoid actually justifying it.

    Additionally, even if most people think something, I don’t care what most people think. In my experience what most people think vs what the best thing to think is are often not aligned.

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Give something 110%”

    Fuck no! 100% is the max. Even that is often too much to ask. Also, what’s in it for me? Your appreciation huh? Well fuck you.

    “I have a challenge for you”.

    No you don’t. You have a problem and want to make it mine. Piss off.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I am going through peoples replies sorta laughing to myself but what you have is the closest thing to something that irritates me. honestly 110 is like all the think out of the box bussiness speak to actualize externalities and such.

  • 315am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    “I call it as I see it.”

    “I’m just very straightforward and honest.”

    No, you’re a prick. That’s what you are.

  • NerdyKeith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    “No offence, but …” followed by an insult.

    Or starting off with an insult, then ending it with “Just saying …”

    As if these phrases nullify being a dick. If you’re going to be an asshole, own it. Don’t make excuses up.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    In writing: “A Masterclass in X” to describe some sort of exemplary behavior. Hate hate hate seeing it.

    I’m more forgiving with spoken language, but agree with the use of “literally” to mean “figuratively”, it bothers me.

    And in niche hairstyling lingo I hate when people use the word “micro-plopping” to describe scrunching or blotting with a cloth, because that technique precedes the word by at least 25 years, it wasn’t invented recently and didn’t need a new word. Plopping is tying your wet hair up in a cloth in a accordioned arrangement for awhile, and scrunching is just scrunching. What they are describing is better explained by saying they blotted with a cloth and/or scrunched with a cloth.

  • 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “Literally” meaning figuratively. I’m fine with most words changing with use; but we need that word! It’s how you indicate you’re not exaggerating or speaking dramatically! Especially these days, that clarification is important!

    I’m also seeing a lot of corporate buzzwords in job descriptions. I get that these are essentially technical terms, but they’re not being used for accuracy or clarity here. You just don’t like how short your description is.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Eh, to make a long story short, corpos have been using jargon and buzzwords in job descriptions, literally forever. 🤪

    • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes, and some people manage to make it slightly worse by trying to be correct saying figuratively instead. You don’t need to add that!

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve taken to using ‘actually literally’ to indicate I’m not being literally figurative. It’s a losing battle, though. Anything we come up with to mean being literal will become a dramatic enhancer eventually.

  • Vupware@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Instead of “et cetera”, the speaker says something akin to “dut da da”. Drives me crazy!

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    You “hold the fort”. It’s a military position.

    Only a fort molester would “hold down” the fort.

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      wait what

      a) can forts be molested b) does holding something down meaning it’s being molested? think paper weights c)

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        a) can forts be molested b) does holding something down meaning it’s being molested?

        I don’t know, but that’s what I think off when someone says “hold down the fort”.

        think paper weights c)

        And if the expression was “hold down the bouncy castle” that would make a lot more sense. Not as an expression … but on a windy day at least.

    • _skj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Just imagine it entered common use through a Looney Toons skit where they had to “hold down” their inflatable fort or it would blow away. It’s not true, but it’s plausible enough you could just decide to believe it.

  • Squirliss@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    “What I think she was trying to say is that- 🤓☝️” Stop trying to put words in my mouth or speak on my behalf when I am right here to put my point across to everyone.

    That followed by those public event speakers that brush off the first round of goodmornings and then say “SAy iT lOuDeR! wHeRes yOuR eNeRgY! DIdNt yOu aLl eAt bReAkfAst?! 🤪” Idk what it is about hearing this sentence early in the morning that inspires so much hatred in me. You could have the most riveting, inspiring and thought provoking presentation in the world and have done lots of commendable deeds but if that string of words exits mouth before showing all of it, I automatically dislike you and whatever you have to say next.

    • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think what youre trying to say is that you want to communicate your own ideas in the way you wish to and not funneled through another mind.

      Also yes anyone in public speaking wanting more of a response is annoying.