• darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      At first, I simply assumed that it referred to the Finnish Civil War (any war with any connection to Russia is top of my mind these days), but then your comment made me realize that it’s more likely to be referring to some civil war that attracted a lot of international fighters, so it must be the Spanish Civil War.

  • quoll@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    fuck yeah, emu war

    edit: stupid fucking ajax comment loading. you cant ctrl+f search for existing comment :\

    • FireWire400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      When I was in Canberra I went on a day tour around the city. As part of the tour we went to the Australian War Memorial, inside I talked to the tour guide a bit and jokingly asked if they had anything about the emu war. He actually went to a lady who was working there and asked.

      I almost couldn’t hold back my laughter. I’m sorry, Bob.

  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    C’mon, so lame. I mean, I agree with the comments saying that being obsessed with a war is dumb, but obviously the right answer would be the Thirty Years War. Far more factions, more casus belli, more fights. Plus, it bolstered German nationalism, which led pretty directly to the Great War, which led to World War II, so those are technically part of its history.

    But maybe I’m biased, because my surname originated in the Huguenot diaspora?

  • naticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because I’m older than the age range I’m required to be a contrarian and go with Peloponnesian War.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder if anyone could analyze education about war (and fascism) and how it correlates with the downfall of the History Channel.

    It used to be wall to wall WW2 documentaries. And prior to streaming, sometimes there was nothing else on. So the channel was on A LOT while I was growing up.

    Then they started with the Ancient Aliens and Ice Road Truckers shit and eventually phased the actual history out entirely.

    Now it seems like the people who grew up during that period know nothing about this shit.

    • Boing@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I didn’t need the History channel when I was a kid to learn about fascism. I had a Grand Father that was in Europe and he didn’t talk much about the war a few of his buddies did and I read/looked at books. We were taught history in school as well. I had a teacher whose family had escaped from East Germany and she was an amazing teacher, a little left wing but that’s understandable. I grew up during the Cold War, when we still had Nukes on Canadian soil. Now we were always called “peace keepers”. That bothers me because during both wars Canadian soldiers were feared on the battlefield. The peace keeper name started with the UN missions but it was also the beginning of the end of our once great military.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      At least with Pawn Stars they would loop the items back to history a lot of times. (Don’t actually remember if Pawn Stars was a history channel show.) But yeah, reality TV slop just filled so many channels.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    what if you think being in to wars and history (The dry, battle of X kind of history, not cool shit like slave rebellions and famines) is kinda lame? Am I like a conscientious objector?

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    War? Haven’t seen one in years … Oh that? Special military operation… This one? That’s a “conflict” but I can see your mistake.

    Genocide? Sorry not familiar with that word

      • scratchee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I feel like that’s justified though. Both sides were out in the middle of fuck all squabbling over a rock with a handful of people on it, very few civilian casualties, low stakes for both countries (well ok, maybe not for the specific governments, but neither side had to worry about being invaded anywhere that really mattered to them). Compared to something like the Ukraine war, it’s more of a skirmish.

        EDIT: to be clear, I do not want the Falkland’s to be “my war”, it was a stupid war.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      <sigh> I miss þe good old “police action.” Especially when it was overseas, unlike now.