• Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Just because some part of the U.S. government ignored the law doesn’t mean the entire U.S. government ignores the law.

    • Xraygoggles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’m not quite sure about this one. I think that the current design on the reverse is an issue. But the front doesn’t seem to break any laws.

      I’m assuming they print these under subsection Y of 31 U.S. Code § 5112 - Denominations, specifications, and design of coins. Which pertains to these 250th anniversary coins.

      The part I see mentioned in this thread frequently applies to a separate subsection (n) for a run of $1 presidential coins that has since ended.

      If you just read subsection Y in a vacuum, they are good to go. This part at the bottom though says that the reverse can’t be a ‘portrait’.

      So this isn’t really slam dunk illegal, but I don’t think that the draft of the coins reverse will make it to print. I would fully expect the front to come out just like that though based on my interpretation.

      (aa)Standards and General Provisions for Circulating Collectible Coins Under Subsections (x), (y), and (z).—

      (1)Prohibition on certain representations.—

      No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of any coin under subsections (x), (y), and (z).

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        I don’t know much about the law, but it feels like the ‘Fight fight fight’ side is overtly party political.

    • Aljernon@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Maybe but they do illegal things all the time and no one is a position to stop them does anything

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Okay so we should all just give up then? Act like laws don’t exist? Just let him?

        • Aljernon@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Obviously not. But pointing out that something is illegal is pointless unless you got a way in mind to make it matter.

  • hcf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 days ago

    This is just bait for people to point out that it’s illegal to commemorate a living president.

    At which point they’ll feign “oopsies” and—surprising absolutely nobody—proceed to roll out a Charlie Kirk coin.

    • echo@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      There’s already shitloads of ads out there for privately minted Kuck rounds

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If such a coin exists ever exists, I hope all of them end up with deep scratches across the face.

    Also, “Fight fight fight” sounds more like the Itchy and Scratchy theme song than some democratic saying.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 days ago

    NO living person should be commemorated on a coin, regardless of political ideology.

    Hopefully, this abomination will go over about as well as the Sacajawea dollar coin.

    • jonesey71@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I loved those coins. Super easy to use in vending machines that could take them. Way better than fucking around with an old paper dollar.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    Surely a 30 cent (or maybe 70 cent or some other not really believable and pretty much useless) coin value would better represent Trump.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’d say a 47¢ coin would be perfect. Plays into his ego, impossible to do math with so no one would actually use it, and it’s a few cents short of a normal functioning thing.

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    I knew it, Steven Miller has been “Weekend-at-Bernie’s”-ing him for two years and so now he’s eligible to have his face on money

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 days ago

    Great idea … no better way to celebrate how stupid this country has become than by sharing another dumb image of this idiot.