Trump’s Office of Management and Budget under Russell Vought has moved with more executive authority over spending, which is typically left to Congress. The administration took steps to cancel foreign aid and asserted power to withhold billions of domestic spending.

“I would expect this shutdown to look different than any other shutdown,” said Joshua Sewell, Taxpayers for Common Sense director of research and policy. He said he expects that the Trump team’s actions would be guided by what they believe achieves the most for them politically.

Trump could use a shutdown to dismantle government functions, wrote Max Stier, chief of executive of the Partnership for Public Service, a nonprofit focused on improving the federal government.

If lawmakers can’t reach a deal, Stier wrote, Trump and Vought “will have enormous latitude to determine which services, programs, and employees can be sidelined, decisions that could go far beyond what has occurred during past shutdowns.”

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Jesus fucking Christ, stop trying to come up with more terrible ideas why the democrats should capitulate. What the actual fuck. They must not knuckle under for ANY reason. You used to be better than this, NPR.

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Trump could use a shutdown to dismantle government functions” He already did that. We had this discussion already the last time, before Schumer and the rest folded. Then he did more of it after they folded. Why is this being trotted out as a threat again?

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because it’s the excuse for not using the filibuster they refused to get rid of for the last two congressional majorities on the grounds that they need it to block republicans when democrats are in the minority.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Exactly.

      The awful shit is going to be awful either way, but one way is democrats helping them be awful.

  • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Except he’s going to do it anyway. It’s never “Give me what I want or I’ll hurt you” with Trump. It’s always “AND I’ll hurt you.”. That’s why negotiating with him is worthless.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 days ago

    Trump dismantled USAID and it’s effectively toast even though Congress is the only group legally allowed to end it. This is shit he would’ve done anyway on a different time schedule. Here’s hoping he bites off more than he can chew and loses another 5% of his base.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Doesn’t the Regime already do this via Executive Order which may or may not be challenged later? Why would they need a ahutdown?

  • Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Congress loves to hold themselves hostage at the sake of federal workers and the American people. They get paid either way, go on vacation. May even give themselves a raise.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Isn’t this the same excuse they used the last time they gave him everything he wanted, without a fight? Are we doing it again, then?

  • blave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Only if somebody doesn’t take this as an opportunity to assassinate him.

    For the betterment of the nation, of course

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      They have legislated various protections. But it always comes down to two parties split about evenly yet needing 60% to pass…… and since it became ok to shut down the government there’s no longer an incentive to negotiate bipartisan solutions

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s another symptom of the dysfunction of Congress; they can’t get 60 senators to agree on a long-term funding bill.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah the republicans have realized that they can demand anything they want to be part of the budget so every year we have a government shutdown then lose some rights to get it up again

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    That made sense in the spring and is one of the reasons I was for not shutting it down then. would have just played into what he was doing. He already tore everything up though and hes not hard to read. He don’t want it. Im fine with shutdown this go round.

  • Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think the plan is to force a shutdown, then seize power saying that the legislature “can’t run the country” so trump has to do it

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    He will have power to decide who to pay but he will be powerless to the backlash from constituents. People are already pissed at him